This has led to a multifaceted and fragmented aid profile allowing various dimensions of development aid policies to be shaped by different interests and priorities. A second is linked to a change in the policy arena and the growing dominance of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. One is depolitisation behind Norwegian aid– a broad political and popular support and consensus but limited debate leaving much space for foreign policy and selfinterest to shape implementation and selection of instruments. Based on Matthew Wood’s concepts of puzzling and powering dynamics behind paradigm shifts the article identifies the forces behind evolving aid policies. The explanation for the evolving profile of Norwegian aid is found in a combination of domestic driving forces. It relies on an analytical framework based on Peter Halls work on paradigm shifts and his distinction between first, second and third order changes. This article maps the evolving continuities and changes in Norwegian development aid since the early 1990s. The commitment to these traditional pillars in Norwegian aid is also accompanied by major changes: reduced focus on partner countries and bilateral aid and an expanding emphasis on supporting global action, the rise of a flourishing number of new thematic priorities and delivery through multilateral channels. Poverty reduction has also stayed as an overarching objective for the aid budget. Norway has remained committed to allocating one percent of its Gross National Income in developing aid.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |